Random Walk

Random Walk

Share this post

Random Walk
Random Walk
White collar stagnation (revisited)
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

White collar stagnation (revisited)

Bonus season is back, it's just not evenly distributed

Moses Sternstein's avatar
Moses Sternstein
Nov 18, 2024
∙ Paid
2

Share this post

Random Walk
Random Walk
White collar stagnation (revisited)
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share
  • the upwardly mobile would love to catch a break

  • a higher unemployed share (that’s still quite low)

  • bonus season is back, but it’s not evenly distributed

  • the ongoing ‘back to normal’ paradox of two simultaneous expansions


👉👉👉Reminder to sign up for the Weekly Recap only, if daily emails is too much. Find me on twitter, for more fun. 

White collar stagnation (revisited)

Random Walk’s theory of White Collar Stagnation is pretty straightforward.

When the steady stream of cheap capital ended, the people who orchestrate the flow of capital would feel the impact to their compensation, more so than others.

  • That includes ‘Finance Bros,’ yes, but also

  • their service providers (e.g. lawyers, consultants),

  • management for the companies who spend all the capital, and

  • some of the more expensive talent (e.g. software engineers).1

Those are generally considered white collar sorts of people, and now that their cheap capital tailwind ended, white collars have “stagnated.”2

That stands in contrast with the acceleration of a blue collar tailwind: national aging and the “labor shortage.”

  • With more people consuming healthcare (paid for by Uncle Sam), demand for a shrinking pool of lower-end service workers increases.

  • Plus, subsidies for manufacturing (and real industrial tailwinds) likewise create a premium for $ervices & Trade$.

Now, because you can’t have your wages and eat them too, inflation has caught up to blue collar wage gains (for the most part), but the point stands that lower-income workers have been the relative winners of the post-pandemic world.3

A higher share of unemployed

Again, nothing catastrophic—far from it—but still a meaningful reshuffling of the hierarchy.

Here’s another nifty little chart to illustrate the point:

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Random Walk to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Moses Sternstein
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More