Random Walk

Random Walk

K-Shape *Poof*

Banks report, lower-income households on a tear, and (maybe) the Wealth Effect is realish

Moses Sternstein's avatar
Moses Sternstein
Jul 16, 2026
∙ Paid
  • banks can confirm the Almighty Consumer is A-OK

  • K-Shape, we hardly knew ye’ — lower income households are on a tear

  • spending more than wages, but how?

  • coda, ‘housing isn’t the cycle, anymore’


👉👉👉Reminder to sign up for the Weekly Recap only, if daily emails is too much. Find me on twitter, for more fun. 
👋👋👋Random Walk has been piloting some other initiatives and now would like to hear from broader universe of you:

(1) 🛎️ Schedule a time to chat with me. I want to know what would be valuable to you. 

(2) 💡 Find out more about Random Walk Idea Dinners. High-Signal Serendipity.

K-Shape Goes Poof

The notion of a “k-shaped” economy just won’t quit the zeitgeist.

Whenever there’s the barest inkling of a k-shape, everyone seems very eager to opine on however which ways the middle- and lower-classes are falling behind the wealthy.

It’s hard to otherwise explain why the K-Shape is such a recurring theme, other than the obvious slopulist appeal. Random Walk has touched on this before, but the K-Shape is structurally implausible—the shape of the labor market and other cyclical factors favor the bottom, relatively. But, also, the data doesn’t support the K-Shape, either.

Did you know that lower-income households are the only post-pandemic real income winners? Well, it’s true (although other data sets vary a bit):

BofA

“Yay, the lower and middle classes are doing pretty great!” is apparently a dog that will not hunt [headlines].

Anyways, it’s bank reporting week, so it’s a good occasion to remember that the Almighty Consumer is A-OK, there is no K-Shape, and while there is at least one curiosity, there may be a contra-Random Walk explanation.

First, from the banks:

Everyone paints a pretty rosy picture of the Almighty Consumer. Only Wells Fargo hints at anything K-shaped, but (as per below), I strongly suspect that’s an artifact of higher gas prices.

In general, the banks are doing pretty well. Credit has grown, they’re making a ton on trading fees, an un-inversion has been good for the biz.

Also, I love a good bedtime story from the most consequential man in global finance, Papa Jamie Dimon:

JPM Q2 ‘26

“It’s great, but it could be terrible, any moment.”

Thank you, JD, for those illuminating comments.


ICYMI

Oil Shock or Nah (and the Machinations of Iran's Biggest Customer)

Oil Shock or Nah (and the Machinations of Iran's Biggest Customer)

Moses Sternstein
·
Jun 5
Read full story
Retail on a Heater

Retail on a Heater

Moses Sternstein
·
May 30
Read full story
Why Isn't the On-Ramp Working?

Why Isn't the On-Ramp Working?

Moses Sternstein
·
May 29
Read full story
Chart Dive on Private Credit, PE/VC

Chart Dive on Private Credit, PE/VC

Moses Sternstein
·
May 21
Read full story
That Escalated Quickly

That Escalated Quickly

Moses Sternstein
·
May 15
Read full story

Started from the bottom (reprise)

As for the data itself, well, whatever K we might have had, has become an E, which itself has become just a squished line.

It starts with hiring and wage growth.

Payrolls, looking pretty good:

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Moses Sternstein.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Moses Sternstein · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture